Residents push protest against liquor licenses while shop owner makes the case for change

By Ruby Couglar

Kathleen McKaveney-Owner Pacific Drapery

Kathleen McKaveney-Owner Pacific Drapery

Kathleen Mckaveney isn’t a newcomer to North Park. Her father opened his Pacific Drapery shop at the corner of North Park Way and 30th Street in 1977, she took over 14 years ago and bought the building in 2000. McKaveney has six employees who have worked for her family an average of over 16 years. She sees herself as a local manufacturer struggling with the tough economy and San Diego’s proximity to cheap labor. In 2008, she made the difficult decision to scale down operations, move to a smaller space, and lease the building where she spent much of her childhood. She explains, “I’m not going out of business, but I do have to adapt.”
McKaveney, who has school-age children and lives in Mission Hills, says she hasn’t made it over to check out the late-night weekend crowds some residents say are plaguing North Park. However, she says she understands what the neighbors are dealing with. “When Shooterz was open, I had a broken window at least once a year and the owner refused to fix it.”
By contrast, she says she has a good relationship with the owners of True North, which began when they came to her after her showroom flooded when the city inadvertently sealed a storm drain while replacing sidewalks.
“I’m very old-fashioned about the kind of people I will lease to.” She likes what Verant Group has done with the Shooterz space and is pleased that they would be able to make a sizeable investment in her property. “I can’t put $500,000 into updating this old building, but they can.”
As for the residents who would prefer her tenant to be a retailer, she points out that in the year her building has been for lease, she has only been approached by restaurants and bars, many of which she felt lacked professionalism or a strong business model. She is not the only property owner trying to lease space in North Park. Chris Lynds, owner of the former Big Lots building, is currently in negotiations with two possible tenants: a restaurant/bar and restaurant/sports bar.
“I’m trying to weigh ethically and morally what would be good for the neighborhood,” says McKaveney. This is why she finds some residents’ attitudes perplexing, citing the popularity of the Rubber Rose and lack of outrage over check cashing places and medical marijuana dispensaries. Although she says she can empathize with the neighbors’ anxiety, she initially fought a major condominium development in Mission Hills but now feels the change was inevitable and not necessarily bad for her neighborhood.
“If you are someone living in North Park, you should be really excited. We are lucky businesses want to invest in our community,” says McKaveney.
“The street has become a bar,” says Linda Artiaga, owner of multiple North Park rental properties, at an informal meeting of troubled residents held at Kathy and Lucky Morrison’s Ray Street home on Jan. 18. Artiaga accompanied her longtime tenant, Valerie Loy, and came armed with multiple color photos of vomit and trash she attributes to bar patrons. Also in attendance were Dan Tomsky, head of North Park Action Team, resident Marcella Hamlin and North Park Redevelopment Project Area Committee board member Don Leichtling, who pointed out he was there as a concerned “owner/occupant,” not a member of the board.
Brought together by their mutual concern over the owners of True North Tavern’s bid for an additional liquor license in the Pacific Drapery building, the neighbors tried to make sense of the many layers of bureaucracy involved in protesting an alcohol license. There are currently six Type 41 liquor license applications in North Park in addition to the one at the Pacific Drapery Building.
Andra Brown, vice squad sergeant with the San Diego Police Department, explains that after the legal unit of the ABC determines the validity of protest letters, the police department “weighs in” on the venue in question by looking at the reported crime rate and the concentration of licenses in a particular census tract. Currently the tract surrounding the Pacific Drapery building is over-concentrated by a 5 to 1 ratio, but the crime rate is well below acceptable levels. This allows the ABC and vice squad to make exceptions. The crime statistics used by these organizations are based solely on reported crime, which does not generally include incidents of petty property damage and noise complaints — the main issues cited by residents who live close to bars.
The meeting ended with the short-term goals of mobilizing their neighbors, contacting city agencies and engaging local leaders. Possible long-term goals included working towards a residential parking district and developing a Residential Improvement District (RID) to work in conjunction with the North Park Main Street Business Improvement District.

Comments

One Response to “Residents push protest against liquor licenses while shop owner makes the case for change”
  1. Consider the following:

    1. NP’s “Arts & Entertainment” District over the last year has morphed into an ever increasingly “Drinking & Entertainment Zone” that is causing ever increasing parking “pressures” and late night neighborhood crime/noise, peaking Fri-Sun nights when these Clubs begin to close at 2 AM.

    2. Even if we had a Parking District Board in place right now (we do not), composed of voting members of the traditional NP Community Organization model (BTW:The model of voting members from all the different groups has proved totally ineffective in helping so far), it would be powerless to stop further “BLIGHT” and insure that the current trend is BOTH reversed and equable solutions were implemented because the Police Vice Unit feels “the crime rate is well below acceptable levels” (see story above)!

    3. Time is of the essence; since there are now not 1 but 3 additional “Big Box Bar/Clubs” that are requesting liquor licenses and if granted, will make solving NP’s parking problems MUCH MORE DIFFICULT, as we are 3+ years “behind” right now.

    4. If these liquor licenses are granted and the 3 new “Big Box Bars” open, these 3 business’s will require more parking than the existing parking garage now has (377 spaces) and that is not even counting the existing parking required by all the clubs now in operation! Where will all these ADDITIONAL employees and patrons park? Where Else, they will park on the streets of the residential neighborhoods just like the employees and patrons of the existing clubs are doing now! I expect NP’s parking “BLIGHT to be 3 to 4 times as bad as it is now…

    5. What is the City’s “long range” solution to new businesses wanting to open in existing buildings with ZERO parking spaces; something call “In-Lieu Fees” where the new businesses pay a fee for each parking space they don’t have and then the City takes this money and spends it somewhere, somehow, BUT they do not provide ANY IMMEDIATE PARKING FOR ALL THESE NEW BUSINESSES. This is great for the Business’s but BLIGHTING FOR EVERYONE OF NORTH PARK’S CURRENT AND FUTURE RESIDENTS.

    6. Until we form a North Park Residential Improvement District (NP-RID) impacted residents will continue to be ignored as the City continues to fund North Park’s Business Improvement District (NP-BID aka NP MainStreet). Why should the Business District get any greater support than North Park’s residents? If the City of San Diego’s Redevelopment Agency motto/ statement from their website is “Revitalizing Neighborhoods and Improving Economic Conditions in San Diego”, why are they BLIGHTING NP?
    http://www.sandiego.gov/redevelopment-agency/index.shtml
    BTW: I’ve been on the NP-PAC Board since the NP-PAC was formed and I’m not speaking for the NP-PAC Board, but as a very active and long time NP Resident concerned about North Park’s future.

    7. If our Council Office does not take immediate steps to stop the granting of additional liquor licenses until we get a Parking Plan in Place, then North Park will become a great place to party but a lousy place to live, especially if you live any where near “North Park’s Business Corridors of University Avenue between Florida Street and the I-805, and 30th Street between Howard Street and Juniper Street”!
    Note:The above location quote is from the Draft NP Parking Management Plan, soon to be released…

    8. If you feel that North Parks RESIDENTS, not just BUSINESS OWNER’S, also deserve a voice in our immediate future then get involved now, call Council member Todd Gloria’s office (619) 236-6633 or email him at toddgloria@sandiego.gov